Convert TAR.GZ to TAR

Drag and drop files here or click to select.
Max file size 100mb.
Uploading progress:

TGZ vs TAR Format Comparison

Aspect TGZ (Source Format) TAR (Target Format)
Format Overview
TGZ
TAR.GZ / Gzip Compressed Tarball

TGZ (TAR.GZ) is a tarball compressed with gzip — the most common archive format on Linux and Unix systems. It combines the TAR archiving utility (which bundles files and directories into a single stream while preserving permissions and ownership) with gzip compression (DEFLATE algorithm). TGZ is the standard format for distributing source code, Linux packages, system backups, and open-source software releases.

Standard Lossless
TAR
Tape Archive

TAR (Tape Archive) is the standard Unix archiving format, originally designed for sequential tape storage in 1979. TAR bundles multiple files and directories into a single uncompressed archive while fully preserving Unix file permissions, ownership, timestamps, and symbolic links. TAR is purely an archiver — it does not compress data, making it ideal for pairing with external compression tools.

Standard Lossless
Technical Specifications
Archiver: TAR (tape archive, POSIX standard)
Compression: Gzip — DEFLATE (LZ77 + Huffman coding)
Compression Levels: 1 (fastest) to 9 (best compression)
Multi-file: Yes — TAR bundles files, gzip compresses the stream
Extensions: .tar.gz, .tgz
Format: POSIX.1-2001 (pax) / GNU tar / UStar
Compression: None — uncompressed archive
Block Size: 512-byte blocks
Multi-file: Yes — bundles files and directories
Extensions: .tar
Archive Features
  • Directory Support: Full directory hierarchy with permissions and ownership
  • Metadata Preserved: File permissions, ownership (UID/GID), timestamps, symlinks
  • Streaming: Yes — can compress/decompress from stdin/stdout
  • Solid Compression: Yes — entire archive compressed as one stream
  • Integrity Check: CRC-32 checksum via gzip layer
  • Unix Attributes: Preserves POSIX permissions, extended attributes
  • Directory Support: Full directory hierarchy with all metadata
  • Metadata Preserved: Permissions, ownership, timestamps, symlinks, device nodes
  • Streaming: Yes — designed for sequential access
  • Compression: None — pair with gzip, bzip2, xz, or zstd externally
  • Incremental Backup: Supports incremental and differential backups
  • Sparse Files: GNU tar supports sparse file handling
Command Line Usage

TGZ is the standard archive format on Linux/Unix:

# Create a .tar.gz archive
tar -czf archive.tar.gz folder/

# Extract a .tar.gz archive
tar -xzf archive.tar.gz

# List contents without extracting
tar -tzf archive.tar.gz

TAR is built into every Unix/Linux system:

# Create a TAR archive (no compression)
tar -cf archive.tar folder/

# Extract a TAR archive
tar -xf archive.tar

# List contents of TAR archive
tar -tf archive.tar
Advantages
  • Compressed — smaller file size for storage and transfer
  • Standard archive format on all Linux/Unix systems
  • Solid compression gives better ratios
  • Universal in developer and open-source communities
  • CRC-32 integrity verification via gzip layer
  • Efficient for network transfers and downloads
  • No compression overhead — instant archiving and extraction
  • Can be recompressed with any algorithm (gzip, bzip2, xz, zstd)
  • Preserves all Unix metadata including special file types
  • Supports incremental and differential backups
  • Simplest Unix archive format — maximum compatibility
  • Can be appended to without rewriting the entire archive
Disadvantages
  • Cannot access individual files without decompressing
  • Slower to create and extract than plain TAR
  • No encryption or password protection
  • Cannot append files without recompressing entire archive
  • Two-layer format adds complexity
  • No compression — archives can be very large
  • Not suitable for network transfer without compression
  • No encryption or password protection
  • Sequential access only — no random file access
  • Not natively supported on Windows
Common Uses
  • Linux source code distribution
  • System backups on Unix/Linux servers
  • Open-source software packaging
  • Docker image layers
  • Python package distribution (sdist)
  • Intermediate archiving before applying compression
  • Disk-to-disk backups where speed matters
  • Bundling files for custom compression workflows
  • Incremental server backups
  • Container image layers (OCI format)
Best For
  • Distributing compressed archives over the network
  • Long-term storage of archived data
  • Source code releases and software packages
  • Any scenario where file size matters
  • Recompressing with a different algorithm (bzip2, xz, zstd)
  • Fast local archiving without compression overhead
  • Preserving full Unix metadata for system migrations
  • Appending files to existing archives
Version History
TAR Introduced: 1979 (Unix V7, Bell Labs)
Gzip Introduced: 1992 (Jean-loup Gailly, Mark Adler)
Status: POSIX standard, actively maintained
Evolution: tar (1979) + compress → tar + gzip (1992) → tar + xz (2009)
Introduced: 1979 (Unix V7, Bell Labs)
Standard: POSIX.1-2001 (pax interchange format)
Status: POSIX standard, actively maintained
Evolution: V7 tar (1979) → UStar (1988) → POSIX pax (2001) → GNU tar extensions
Software Support
Windows: 7-Zip, WinRAR, WSL, Windows 11 built-in
macOS: Built-in tar/gzip, Keka, The Unarchiver
Linux: Built-in tar/gzip, file-roller, Ark
Mobile: ZArchiver (Android), iZip (iOS)
Programming: Python tarfile+gzip, Node.js tar, Java Apache Commons Compress
Windows: 7-Zip, WinRAR, WSL, Windows 11 built-in
macOS: Built-in tar command, Keka, The Unarchiver
Linux: Built-in tar command, file-roller, Ark
Mobile: ZArchiver (Android), iZip (iOS)
Programming: Python tarfile, Node.js tar, Java Apache Commons Compress

Why Convert TAR.GZ to TAR?

Converting TAR.GZ to plain TAR removes the gzip compression layer while preserving the complete archive structure. This is useful when you need to recompress the archive with a different algorithm — such as bzip2, xz, or zstd — that offers better compression ratios or faster speeds for your specific use case. By extracting to TAR first, you avoid the overhead of decompressing and re-archiving the entire contents.

Plain TAR archives are faster to work with because there is no compression or decompression step. If you are performing local operations where disk space is not a constraint — such as building software from source, inspecting archive contents, or preparing files for a different workflow — removing the gzip layer eliminates unnecessary processing time and CPU usage.

TAR archives support appending files without rewriting the entire archive, a feature impossible with compressed TAR.GZ files. If you need to add files to an existing archive, converting to plain TAR first allows you to use tar -rf to append efficiently. This is particularly valuable for incremental backup workflows where new files are added to an existing archive over time.

Some tools and systems work exclusively with uncompressed TAR archives. Container runtimes, certain build systems, and custom deployment scripts may expect plain .tar input. Converting from TAR.GZ to TAR ensures compatibility with these tools without losing any archive metadata — all file permissions, ownership, timestamps, and symbolic links are fully preserved.

Key Benefits of Converting TAR.GZ to TAR:

  • Recompression Flexibility: Apply bzip2, xz, or zstd compression to the TAR instead
  • Faster Access: No decompression overhead when extracting or listing files
  • Append Support: Add files to the archive without rewriting it
  • Full Metadata: All Unix permissions, ownership, and symlinks preserved
  • Tool Compatibility: Some systems require plain TAR input
  • Reduced CPU Usage: No compression/decompression processing needed
  • Pipeline Flexibility: Pipe TAR output to any compression tool

Practical Examples

Example 1: Recompressing with XZ for Better Ratio

Scenario: A developer wants to switch from gzip to xz compression for a source code release to reduce download size by 30-40%.

Source: linux-6.8.tar.gz (230 MB)
Step 1: TGZ → TAR → linux-6.8.tar (1.4 GB)
Step 2: TAR → XZ → linux-6.8.tar.xz (145 MB)

Benefits:
✓ 37% smaller than the original .tar.gz
✓ XZ (LZMA2) achieves much better compression on source code
✓ Standard format for Linux kernel releases
✓ All file permissions and metadata preserved
✓ Worth the extra compression time for public downloads

Example 2: Appending Files to an Existing Archive

Scenario: A sysadmin needs to add new configuration files to an existing backup archive without recreating it from scratch.

Source: server_config_backup.tar.gz (50 MB)
Conversion: TGZ → TAR → server_config_backup.tar (180 MB)

Append operation:
tar -rf server_config_backup.tar new_configs/
✓ New files appended in seconds (no full rewrite)
✓ Original archive contents untouched
✓ Can recompress to .tar.gz after appending
✓ Impossible to append to compressed .tar.gz directly

Example 3: Feeding a Container Build System

Scenario: A DevOps engineer needs to provide a plain TAR archive as input to a container image build tool that does not accept compressed archives.

Source: app-layer-v2.tar.gz (85 MB, container layer)
Conversion: TGZ → TAR
Result: app-layer-v2.tar (320 MB)

Build pipeline:
✓ Build tool imports plain TAR layer directly
✓ No decompression step needed in the pipeline
✓ Faster builds when disk I/O is faster than CPU decompression
✓ Compatible with OCI image specification requirements

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: How much larger will the TAR file be compared to TAR.GZ?

A: Significantly larger — typically 3x to 10x depending on the content. Gzip compression ratios vary by data type: text files compress 5-10x, binaries 2-4x. A 100 MB .tar.gz could expand to 300 MB–1 GB as a plain .tar file. This is expected since you are removing all compression.

Q: Is any data lost when removing gzip compression?

A: No. Gzip is lossless compression — decompressing it produces the exact original TAR archive, bit-for-bit identical. All files, directories, permissions, timestamps, ownership, and symbolic links are fully preserved in the resulting TAR file.

Q: Why would I want an uncompressed TAR instead of TAR.GZ?

A: Common reasons include: recompressing with a better algorithm (xz, zstd), appending files to the archive (impossible with compressed archives), feeding tools that require plain TAR input, or working in environments where CPU is limited but disk space is abundant.

Q: Can I recompress the TAR with a different algorithm?

A: Yes, that is one of the main reasons for this conversion. Once you have a plain .tar, you can compress it with xz (tar.xz — best ratio), bzip2 (tar.bz2 — good balance), zstd (tar.zst — fastest modern option), or keep it uncompressed.

Q: Is the conversion fast?

A: Yes, very fast. The conversion only needs to decompress the gzip layer — a single-pass streaming operation. There is no re-archiving or re-compression step. Speed is limited primarily by disk I/O, not CPU. A 1 GB .tar.gz typically decompresses in seconds.

Q: Can I append files to a TAR.GZ without converting first?

A: No. TAR archives support appending (tar -rf), but this only works on uncompressed .tar files. Compressed archives (.tar.gz, .tar.bz2, .tar.xz) must be fully decompressed before appending, then recompressed. Converting to plain TAR first is the standard workflow.

Q: What is the difference between TAR and TAR.GZ?

A: TAR is a pure archiver — it bundles files into a single container without compression. TAR.GZ adds a gzip compression layer on top. Think of TAR as a box that holds files, and TAR.GZ as that same box wrapped in compression. Converting TGZ to TAR simply unwraps the compression.

Q: Do I need special software to open .tar files?

A: On Linux and macOS, the tar command is built in. On Windows 11, tar is available natively in Command Prompt/PowerShell. Older Windows versions need 7-Zip or WinRAR. All major archive managers on every platform support .tar files.