Convert SXW to Textile

Drag and drop files here or click to select.
Max file size 100mb.
Uploading progress:

SXW vs Textile Format Comparison

Aspect SXW (Source Format) Textile (Target Format)
Format Overview
SXW
StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Writer Document

SXW is a legacy document format used by StarOffice and early versions of OpenOffice.org Writer. It is a ZIP archive containing XML files (content.xml, styles.xml, meta.xml) that define the document structure, formatting, and metadata. SXW was the predecessor to the modern ODT format and is still readable by LibreOffice, OpenOffice, and Pandoc.

Legacy Document ZIP/XML Archive
Textile
Textile Markup Language

Textile is a lightweight markup language used for formatting text into structurally valid HTML. It provides a simple, human-readable syntax for creating headings, lists, links, images, tables, and text formatting. Textile is popular in content management systems like Redmine and was historically used in Textpattern CMS.

Markup Language Web Publishing
Technical Specifications
Structure: ZIP archive containing XML files
Creator: StarOffice/OpenOffice.org Writer
Content Files: content.xml, styles.xml, meta.xml
MIME Type: application/vnd.sun.xml.writer
Extension: .sxw
Structure: Plain text with Textile markup syntax
Encoding: UTF-8
Output: Converts to valid XHTML/HTML
MIME Type: text/x-textile
Extension: .textile
Syntax Examples

SXW contains XML content within a ZIP archive:

<!-- content.xml inside .sxw -->
<office:body>
  <text:p text:style-name="Heading1">
    Project Plan
  </text:p>
  <text:p text:style-name="Standard">
    Key deliverables and timeline.
  </text:p>
</office:body>

Textile uses simple markup for formatting:

h1. Project Plan

Key deliverables and timeline.

*Bold text* and _italic text_

# First item
# Second item
# Third item
Content Support
  • Formatted text with styles and fonts
  • Tables, lists, and nested structures
  • Embedded images and objects
  • Headers, footers, and page numbering
  • Footnotes and endnotes
  • Document metadata (author, title, date)
  • Table of contents and indexes
  • Headings (h1. through h6.)
  • Bold, italic, underline, strikethrough
  • Ordered and unordered lists
  • Tables with header rows
  • Hyperlinks and inline images
  • Block quotes and code blocks
  • CSS class and style attributes
Advantages
  • Open XML-based document format
  • Compressed ZIP archive for smaller file sizes
  • Supports complex document structures
  • Metadata preserved in separate XML files
  • Still readable by modern office suites
  • Predecessor to the standardized ODF format
  • Human-readable without rendering
  • Generates valid HTML/XHTML output
  • Simple, intuitive syntax
  • Supports inline CSS styling
  • Plain text, version-control friendly
  • Built-in support in Redmine and other tools
Disadvantages
  • Legacy format superseded by ODT
  • Limited support in newer applications
  • Not an international standard like ODF
  • Complex internal XML structure
  • Fewer editing tools available compared to ODT
  • Less widely adopted than Markdown
  • Limited ecosystem compared to other markups
  • No standardized specification
  • Cannot represent complex page layouts
  • Limited support in modern static site generators
Common Uses
  • Legacy StarOffice and OpenOffice documents
  • Archived office documents from early 2000s
  • Government and institutional legacy files
  • Migration projects to modern formats
  • Historical document preservation
  • Redmine wiki and issue descriptions
  • Textpattern CMS content
  • Web content authoring
  • Project documentation in issue trackers
  • Blog posts and articles
Best For
  • Opening legacy StarOffice/OpenOffice files
  • Accessing archived document content
  • Migrating older documents to modern formats
  • Working with pre-ODF office documents
  • Content authoring for Redmine wikis
  • Quick HTML content generation
  • Readable formatted text documents
  • CMS platforms supporting Textile
Version History
Introduced: 2002 with StarOffice 6.0 / OpenOffice.org 1.0
Based On: XML-based office document format
Superseded By: ODT (ODF 1.0, 2005)
Status: Legacy format, still readable
Introduced: 2002 by Dean Allen
Primary Use: Textpattern CMS
Adopted By: Redmine, GitHub (historical)
Status: Stable, niche usage
Software Support
LibreOffice: Full read/write support
OpenOffice: Native format support
Pandoc: Reads SXW as ODT variant
Calligra Suite: Import support
Redmine: Built-in Textile support
Pandoc: Read/write Textile format
Libraries: RedCloth (Ruby), textile-js (JS)
Editors: Any text editor

Why Convert SXW to Textile?

Converting SXW to Textile transforms legacy StarOffice Writer documents into a lightweight markup format suitable for web publishing and content management systems. Textile is particularly useful for teams using Redmine for project management, where wiki pages and issue descriptions are authored in Textile syntax.

Textile provides a balance between readability and formatting capability. Unlike plain text, Textile preserves document structure through its markup syntax, including headings, bold/italic text, lists, tables, and links. This means your SXW document content retains its organizational hierarchy when converted to Textile.

The conversion is especially valuable for migrating legacy office documents into modern web-based documentation systems. Rather than manually retyping content from old SXW files, the converter automatically maps document structures to their Textile equivalents, saving significant time and effort.

Our converter extracts content from the SXW ZIP archive, parses the XML document structure, and generates properly formatted Textile markup. Headings are mapped to h1. through h6. syntax, paragraphs are separated by blank lines, and lists are converted to Textile list notation.

Key Benefits of Converting SXW to Textile:

  • Redmine Integration: Use converted content directly in Redmine wiki pages and issues
  • Readable Markup: Textile is human-readable even without rendering
  • HTML Generation: Textile converts to valid HTML for web publishing
  • Structure Preservation: Document headings, lists, and emphasis are maintained
  • Plain Text: Textile files are plain text, editable with any text editor
  • Version Control: Track changes easily in Git with meaningful diffs

Practical Examples

Example 1: Redmine Wiki Migration

A development team discovers legacy project specifications in SXW format from an old StarOffice installation. Converting to Textile allows them to paste the content directly into Redmine wiki pages, preserving headings, lists, and text formatting. The team can then collaboratively edit and update the documentation within Redmine.

Example 2: Blog Content Preparation

A writer has articles saved in SXW format that need to be published on a blog platform supporting Textile. Converting to Textile produces web-ready content with proper heading hierarchy, emphasized text, and list structures that render correctly when the blog engine processes the Textile markup.

Example 3: Issue Tracker Documentation

A project manager needs to create detailed issue descriptions in Redmine from legacy SXW requirement documents. Converting to Textile generates properly formatted text that can be pasted into issue descriptions, preserving the document structure and making requirements easily readable in the issue tracker.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What is Textile markup?

A: Textile is a lightweight markup language that converts plain text with simple formatting codes into valid HTML. For example, *bold* produces bold text, _italic_ produces italic text, and h1. at the start of a line creates a heading. It was created by Dean Allen in 2002 and is used in Redmine, Textpattern, and other platforms.

Q: Can I use the Textile output in Redmine?

A: Yes. Redmine natively supports Textile markup for wiki pages, issue descriptions, and comments. The converted Textile content can be pasted directly into Redmine and will render with proper formatting including headings, lists, bold, and italic text.

Q: How are SXW headings converted to Textile?

A: SXW heading styles (Heading1, Heading2, etc.) are mapped to Textile heading syntax: h1. for level 1, h2. for level 2, and so on through h6. This preserves the document hierarchy in the Textile output.

Q: Are tables from SXW preserved in Textile?

A: Textile supports table markup using pipe characters. Table content from SXW documents is converted to Textile table syntax where possible, with header rows marked using |_. notation. Complex table formatting like merged cells may be simplified.

Q: Is Textile the same as Markdown?

A: No. Textile and Markdown are different markup languages with different syntax. For example, Textile uses *bold* and _italic_, while Markdown uses **bold** and *italic*. Both produce HTML output but have distinct formatting rules. Textile has built-in support for CSS classes and more complex table formatting.

Q: Are images from SXW included in Textile output?

A: The converter focuses on text content extraction. Embedded images from SXW files are not automatically included. However, if images are extracted separately, you can reference them in Textile using the !image_url! syntax.

Q: Can I convert Textile back to a document format?

A: Yes. Tools like Pandoc can convert Textile to many other formats including DOCX, ODT, HTML, and PDF. This makes Textile a useful intermediate format for document workflows.

Q: How does the converter handle special characters?

A: Special characters that have meaning in Textile syntax (such as asterisks, underscores, and pipe characters) are properly escaped in the output to prevent unintended formatting. The converter ensures the text content appears correctly when rendered.